'Zodiac' Special Edition

Based on his fiendishly artistic, misanthropic and influential necro-fetish classic Se7en, we already knew David Fincher could craft the perfect serial killer movie. And yet Fincher, a subversive, substance-soaked stylist, chartered new territory with the stunningly ambitious Zodiac, a movie that goes above and beyond the perceived limitations of the serial killer genre by becoming not only an intricate study of obsession, but a moody explication of one of our darkest eras - the 1970's. 

Taken from the real life case of The Zodiac Killer  -- a mysterious, black hooded assassin who terrified the San Francisco Bay area just as the '60s were coming to a close  --  the picture boasts horrifying, unnervingly tense sequences of random yet bizarrely ritualistic acts of violence. But the picture's not simply content with its startling death throttles,  and instead narrows its focus on three men (Jake Gyllenhaal, Mark Ruffalo and an extraordinary Robert Downey Jr.) so consumed by capturing the elusive killer, that their fervency borders on madness -- a madness they (and consequently the viewer) cannot shake. 

Part police procedural, part journalistic drama, a la All The Presidents Men, Zodiac deftly and densely splits narrative, making for a multifaceted  and unexpectedly mordant examination of the era's pessimism and unease, particularly since the crime may never be solved. Like a true '70s movie, one leaves the picture haunted; riddled with unanswered questions and an enveloping sense of dread that just clings to you. And seriously, if the song wasn't creepy enough, you'll never hear Donovan's "Hurdy Gurdy Man" without visions of a faceless fiend stalking you in a black car on a dark night.

One of the best movies of 2007, Paramount recently released a special edition "Director's Cut" of "Zodiac" with two fascinating documentaries, commentary tracks that include (among others) director David Fincher and crime novelist James Ellroy (also a droll Robert Downey Jr. and Jake Gyllenhaal ), and nearly ten minutes added to the picture. The documentaries are especially intriguing and include interviews with those involved in the real-life case. The account by the living victims are, in a grand understatement, haunting, and a story told by the 911 dispatcher who took the killer's call chilled me to the bone.

If you missed this masterpiece in the theater (shame on you!) then get thee to your Netflix and rent this edition. Or even better, buy the thing.

Mean Streets Revisited

meanstreets8.jpg

Since recently spending time in New York City, I thought of all kinds of New York movies (from Rosemary’s Baby to 42nd Street to The Naked City to Midnight Cowboy to After Hours to Broadway Danny Rose to The Lost Weekend and on and on and on). But after strolling through some beautiful areas and others much too cleaned up (Times Square), my mind was wandering to James Cagney and John Garfield growing up in Hell’s Kitchen (which isn’t so hellish anymore) and the Dead End Kids gaining advice from both of those stars as they, cinematically speaking, brawled and cracked wise on those streets that refer to the movie I really kept thinking about—Mean Streets.

meanstreets5.jpg

And yes, yes, much has been written about Martin Scorsese’s masterwork and most of us love it. But it had been quite some time since I watched the picture, and upon returning, my love was re-ignited. As Woody Allen would say, I don’t just love the movie, I luurve it.

Let’s just start with the opening—an opening that ranks as one of the greatest title sequences of all time.  The screen is black. A faceless narrator exclaims: "You don't make up for your sins at church; you do it in the streets; you do it at home. The rest is bullshit, and you know it." A young man wakes up in the middle of the night. The sounds of the city are outside. He walks over to his bedroom mirror, takes a look at himself and then returns to bed. As his head reclines toward his pillow, he is suddenly moving in slow motion. The thumping beat of the Ronettes' "Be My Baby" begins and the scene shifts to a screening of Super-8 films of the young man and his friends. Just as Ronnie Spector breaks into the beautifully sweet chorus of "Be my, be my baby," the film reveals its title in plain, typewritten letters: Mean Streets.

Man, oh man. This opening always gets me right in the gut and even at times, almost makes me cry. Well, not almost. It does make me cry. It’s just so fucking brilliant and wonderfully bittersweet. It's reminiscent of a past that isn't mine and yet, Scorsese makes me feel like it could be. It gets me the way Wes Anderson gets me. No wonder Scorsese loves him so much. 

Released in 1973, Mean Streets, a masterpiece of story, substance, music, camerawork and color, is one of the most influential movies of the last 30-odd years. Inspired by, among other influences, classic Hollywood cinema, the documentaries of David and Albert Maysles, the French New Wave, and of course, Scorsese’s own life growing up and observing life in New York City, Mean Streets' raw, blood-soaked power has still, in my mind, found no cinematic equal. Aesthetically and thematically honest, as well as experimental and purposeful, it’s a work of art that’s never faded through time. It still makes me revved up and emotional and depressed and happy and, yearning. There’s a yearning to Mean Streets that not only taps into creating something within your own personal life, but to create something, anything outside of it. As with all of Scorsese, there's a sensuality to it that's bloody and lovely and in moments, profoundly moving.

meanstreets7.jpg

The story is noir bathed in red light. Harvey Keitel plays Charlie, an inhabitant of New York's Little Italy who is raggedly progressing toward manhood. His best friend is Johnny Boy (Robert DeNiro), a volatile, immature but ultimately lovable character who gets Charlie in more trouble than he needs. Charlie is trying his best to become something, but he is met with constant dilemmas. He works for his uncle (Cesare Danova), an old-school Mafioso who would like to move him up in the business. But Uncle disapproves of Charlie's friends, chiefly his epileptic lover, Teresa (Amy Robinson), and Johnny Boy, who is "touched in the head" and an instigator of unnecessary disorder. Uncle advises Charlie to remove them from his life. But this is not so easy. Nothing is easy for Charlie. Strongly Catholic, he is guilt-ridden by his every move. While he sits at the bar in his neighborhood hangout, questioning his penance, he watches Johnny Boy walk toward him and almost humorously asks: "You talk about penance and this is what walks through the door?"

Johnny Boy certainly walks through the door. His entrance is a tour de force of exciting visual and sonorous stimuli. Bathed in the bloody red light of the bar, shot in slow motion and accompanied by the Rolling Stones' "Jumpin Jack Flash," the joy and ambiguity of Johnny Boy is summed up in less than 30 seconds. He is the streets; he is exciting, nervous energy; he is trouble amidst trouble; he’s your future if you don’t watch out. And he’s also one hell of a fighter on a pool table—the way he kicks with such intent. In fact, that “Mook” fight tuned to “Please Mr. Postman” is one of my favorite fight scenes in a movie. It’s so sloppy and real yet funny and repugnant. This is how fights happen and sometimes, they are hilarious.

meanstreets1.jpg

And Johnny Boy is kind of hilarious. The symbol of uncertainty that, like the streets, threatens the picture's world with kinetic violence, he’s an attractive force. But like many reckless forces, they burn out. Charlie attempts to ride this out with some semblance of control, but he can’t avoid the tumult that will engulf around his own life. What is so unequivocally brilliant about this film is that Charlie never has to tell us as much. Because of Scorsese's expert technique, we know the picture's nature instinctively. Scorsese displays the randomness of these people's lives with saturating experimentalism; his inventive style is not a glaring gimmick but a natural expression of street and conscience.

meanstreets2.jpg

Mean Streets contains so many influential techniques it would require pages to list them all, but some do bear mentioning--particularly for how they are abused in present cinema. As most of us know, Mean Streets, like other filmmakers of the period utilized the New Wave technique of a moving camera, now seen often in movies and TV commercials. It used Super-8 film stock to convey happy, jumpy memories, which is now an overused, trite standard á la The Wonder Years and countless other more recent examples. Mean Streets employed the character-introducing title sequence, where key figures are shown doing something (Johnny Boy blows up a mailbox), and then their names are typewritten on the screen. This was used in Trainspotting, a movie that has more than a few references to Scorsese. It was scored with pop music as an interesting counterpoint to violence (clearly, Scorsese's musicality has been imitated effectively in films like Blood Simple and Reservoir Dogs). Mean Streets' film references--Charlie watching John Ford's The Searchers and Uncle watching Fritz Lang's The Big Heat--contained a specific potency that plays differently than the reference-soaked movies of Quentin Tarantino. I love Tarantino's operatic movie mélange but with films now so readily available on DVD, Mean Streets snippet from The Searchers feels rarer, and in a way, more sacred.

meanstreets6.jpg

I'm not one to downgrade the importance of Citizen Kane and its influences (and certainly Scorsese wouldn’t as well) but Mean Streets is at this point, just as influential. Taxi Driver, Raging Bull and Goodfellas may make the AFI lists, but Mean Streets deserves high mention. So many films emulate Mean Streets, but very few have achieved its beautiful, ugly, vulnerable, violent and thrilling power.

Buddy Bobbies

hotfuzzpic3.jpg picture by BrandoBardot

There's a scene in Hot Fuzz that made me laugh so hard, I had to check my reaction after the picture had ended. For Pete's sake, it was, of all things, a swan, sitting in the back seat of a car, rearing its angry head towards an evil Timothy Dalton. Why on earth is this so damn hilarious?

I can't entirely explain except that the movie's set up to the swan incident is near brilliant: an innocent, lovely animal that was simply a cute nuisance surprisingly saves the day. But it's more than that-mirroring the movie as a whole, somehow the swan gag, as easy as it is, feels smart, fresh, as if the filmmakers thought, if a swan's going to attack Timothy Dalton, it's going to be unlike any other crazy animal attack you've ever seen.

Which puts director Edgar Wright and co-writer/star Simon Pegg in line with the pictures Hot Fuzz is parodying-over the top, high adrenaline, bullet and explosion strewn American action movies. Unlike the Brits' more endearing zombie comedy Shaun of the Dead (a zom-rom-com as some have called it-I can't bring myself to use that term) in which Romero was lovingly revered, Hot Fuzz knows the Bruckheimer/Bay action extravaganzas they're referencing are silly. But that doesn't mean they don't like the movies explicitly addressed (like Point Break or the endlessly, impressively bizarre Bad Boys II). On the contrary, Wright and Pegg are fans of the genre, partially because the pictures are so absurd, so distinctly American.

hotfuzzpic2-1.jpg picture by BrandoBardot

So by placing the action in a quiet little British village in which the big news of the day is that (yes) swan wandering out of the garden, the high octane style, rapid editing and ultra seriousness of the film's kick-ass vision is made even more hilarious. Pegg plays square, by-the-book super cop Nicholas Angel, whose sanctimoniousness perfection has earned him the dump out of the mean streets of London (he's making all the other cops look bad). In his new assignment, he's got nothing to do but watch everyone on his new police force eat. To make matters worse, his slobby partner (Nick Frost-his mate from Shaun), son of the chief inspector (Jim Broadbent), only understands police work through his vast collection of Hollywood action pictures.

The sweet little town does have some weird edges to its perpetually smiling front. Though the murder rate is zero, there are an exorbitant number of fatal accidents killing off various residents and Angel is determined to find out why. The answer turns out to be much more sinister than even he expected and the picture moves into its third and even fourth acts with frenetic insanity, a hilarious nod to the typical third and sometimes fourth acts of overlong action pictures. The length and ending of the picture bothered some critics and viewers, but I thought that was entirely the point--the wait, here's another twist angle, let's ladle one crazy incident on top of the other. If you've seen Bad Boys II, you'll get it entirely.

Pegg and Frost do ten times better than most current American parodies (like the latest Scary Movie sequel or the abysmal Date Movie), feeling more like Jonze/Kaufman's Adaptation (which also pokes fun at ridiculous Hollywood movies in its over the top last act) than Epic Movie. Its cleverness and ability to weave a story around its ideas and humor makes the viewer actually care about this crazy pair even amidst the absolute ridiculousness along the way-much like in Shaun of the Dead. Or really, much like in Bad Boys II.

Hollywood Ending: 'Alpha Dog'

To be young, cunning, good looking and wanted. Isn't that most of what we yearn for at age 20? For Johnny Truelove (real name: Jesse James Hollywood) the answer would be a declarative yes. But then, on second thought, it might also be a resounding no. He was certainly wanted-and by the FBI no less-which feeds into the conundrum of this creature, this cunning little sociopath who basked in his Alpha status over a pack of wild, desperate, teenage dogs but who was clearly reckless enough to misunderstand the concept of witnesses. In short, Nick Cassavetes couldn't have picked a better title for his big screen examination of young Hollywood, fictionalized here as young Truelove.

Alpha Dog recounts the true life saga of Jesse James Hollywood, an alarmingly persuasive young man who in 2000 led the kidnapping and finally, murder of 15-year-old Nicholas Markowitz. Markowitz was a shy boy from the San Fernando Valley whose older half-brother owed Hollywood the relatively meager sum of $1,250. Chump change to a guy who could afford a $200,000 home at 20. But that's not the craziest part of the crime. What's most tragic and ridiculous and then understandable given how he was soon treated, Markowitz, terrified at first, eventually grew comfortable with his captors and enjoyed the nonstop partying that seemed to take off whenever he was near. Dubbed "The Stolen Boy" by the So Cal kids who hung in Hollywood's circle, he had no idea what really awaited him. Offed by one of Hollywood's cronies, while another watched, the "party" met with a violent (and to any rational person's mind), insanely stupid end. Four teens were charged with the murder, including Hollywood, who made a dramatic escape to Brazil where he was arrested in 2005. He still awaits trial.

In the meantime, Alpha Dog was made, a meticulously researched film that changes the names, but very few of the details. Cassavetes was given access to leaked files by the case's prosecutor (who was removed due to the privilege), and reconstructs the case with a style that's both intensely focused and nervously loose. It's one of the film's greatest achievements-you know exactly what's going to happen and yet you feel tense and filled with a particular kind of dread. All of these kids are so damn unlikable (really, you dislike them so much it's almost hard to endure their stupidity) and yet you're filled with this despair.

Part of that also lies in the film's performances. Emile Hirsch, an actor of impressive range (watch his powerful turns in Lords of Dogtown and The Mudge Boy and you'll see what I mean) is almost detestable as Truelove, somewhat charming but mostly just an obnoxious bully with a Napoleon complex. He holds sway over the affluent So-Cal kids he calls his "boys," chiefly his dim witted slave Elvis Schmidt (Shawn Hatosy) who will end up pulling the trigger and Frankie Ballenbacher (a wonderfully natural Justin Timberlake), a macho pseudo bad boy with a conscience. Frankie comes to like their hostage, Zack (played by a wide-eyed Anton Yelchin), and will try to talk Truelove out of killing him. He's obviously not successful and, even worse, is present at the shooting.

Why? Cassavetes, who also wrote the story, never really answers that question (how could he?) and instead throws out the usual culprits from questionable parenting to drugs to the unreality of music videos, but the cues are just out there, the ever-present sea these fishy kids swim in. What's more relevant is that Cassavetes never glamorizes the well off punks, but he doesn't demonize them either. The picture presents them how they probably appeared--stoned, loud and kind of stupid. And also, maybe so out of touch with the true seriousness of the situation that they went along with the plan because, well, the kid looked like he was having a good time and you know how things can get a little out of hand sometimes...

And therein lies the film's horror and curiosity. That the young victim was probably enjoying himself enough to trust his murderers. That being held hostage was such a memorable experience. That he may have even felt like he was in some crime story movie of his life. And that Truelove would give him such a, quite literally, Hollywood ending.

It's A Beautiful World We Live In--'Idiocracy'

Mike Judge’s Idiocracy was one of the greatest films of last year. And not just one the greatest films barely anyone saw, but one of the greatest satires to hit screens in a long time. Truly, the movie could be paired as a double feature with Alfonso Cuarón’s Children of Men. Only, unlike the lack of children of Cuarón’s tale, there’s too many kids in the dystopian future of Idiocracy—kids and adults who are dumb— really dumb. And yet, for anyone who’s walked among the masses in a strip mall, they’re all believably dumb.

You might have heard the story behind Judge's comedy (released today on DVD)— it was shelved a few years after completion and released by Twentieth Century Fox as a throw-away, a let’s-forget-this-movie-was-ever-made dump. No advance word, no posters, no trailers, nothing. Why? No one knows for sure, but I’m thinking that attacking Starbucks, Fuddruckers, Carl’s Jr. and Costco had something to do with it. Oh yes, and Fox News, can’t forget that beacon of “fair and balanced” broadcast journalism. Fittingly, this is exactly the kind of DEVO inspired treatment Idiocracy is mocking—that big business rules and there’s very little we can do about it. So, like Judge’s Beavis and Butt-head , his now classic Office Space and his TV Show King of the Hill, Idiocracy (and the predicament it fell into) is both darkly hilarious and deeply sad.

Judge sets his film in a future 500 years forward (well, not exactly forward) in which the entire population has been dumbed down beyond mediocrity—the mass consumers, Big Gulp guzzling, latte lovers have inherited the earth.These are the people who think Carl’s Jr. Ads are so funny and “extreme” that the burger joint's tagline has become “Fuck You. I’m eating.” And Fuddruckers has finally blatantly de-evolved into the Beavis and Butt-head joke it’s always been-- "Buttfuckers."  Sentence structure is lost, and the English language is a hybrid of hillbilly, urban slang and Valley speak.

Entering this destroyed landscape of mass garbage is the most average guy in the world, Joe (Luke Wilson) sent from the present via an Army experiment that’s gone horribly awry (he was only supposed to hibernate for a year but his superior was caught pimping and…). Along with him is a prostitute named Rita (Maya Rudolph) who’s got nothing to lose except pissing off her pimp.  The joke, of many, is that in the future, boring, no motivation Joe is the smartest guy in the world. And as such, he’s enlisted by the stupid’s to help solve their problems—like why plants won’t grow. I won’t ruin it for you but the lack of green has something to do with water only being used in a toilet.

Yes, the humor is often lowbrow, but that's exactly the point. It’s rare that a movie this smart displays such deft comic timing concerning the asinine. What’s also wonderful about Idiocracy is that, underneath the incredibly caustic worldview (Mike Judge is really giving the finger to a lot of people and institutions here) there’s a tragic sweetness (Judge’s use of Buck Owens' bittersweet instrumental “Buckaroo” is especially potent). Weirdly, you come to care about Joe’s dim-wit lawyer Frito (a hilarious Dax Shepard) and find the President of the United States, or rather, the former smackdown champ (Terry Crews) somewhat charming. The message Judge conveys is that both big business and the public’s embracing of mindless popular entertainment has destroyed us. So in a sense, it’s not really Frito’s fault that he’s so fucking stupid. It’s our fault.

I can handle blame, and so can most people. Why Fox possibly couldn’t is not only overly fearful and controlling, but, as Frito might say, retarded.

Watching Paint Dry? 'My Night at Maud's'

Arthur Penn's neo-noir masterpiece Night Moves (1975) has tough-guy detective Gene Hackman saying this of French filmmaker Eric Rohmer: "I saw a Rohmer film once; it was kind of like watching paint dry."

Whether the sentiment only reflected the non-art house pretensions of Penn’s protagonist (who would suffer his own existential crisis in a grittier though certainly artistic film) or Penn himself is up for question. But the line did (in 1975) and still does show that the audience for Rohmer is of a more critical set. Perhaps even, a more pretentious lot. This isn’t to criticize Rohmer himself since many of his pictures are absorbing, emotional and deeply intelligent, but you have a feeling that some viewers pretend to enjoy Rohmer films because, well, they do at times, feel like you’re “watching paint dry.”

But what pretty, fascinating paint, especially in his 1969 landmark My Night at Maud's. The third of Rohmer's Six Moral Tales (released together in a wonderful Criterion box set), My Night at Maud's was the director's first real hit. A major success at Cannes, its New York City art house following was so strong that it lead to the film's general release. Maud's also went on to receive two Oscar nominations, for Best Foreign Language Film and Best Original Screenplay.

A simple and direct picture, but one full of moral complexity and philosophical discourse, My Night at Maud's offers resonant irony and insight into a virtuous though difficult love story. Jean-Louis Trintignant plays Jean Louis, an engineer and faithful Catholic who notices the pretty blonde Françoise in church one day and immediately decides she will be his wife. In the meantime, he meets up with an old friend, Vidal (Antoine Vitez), a Marxist who leads him to the lovely, lusty, divorced Maud (Françoise Fabian). What follows is a deep discussion between the characters, covering subjects such as atheism, pre-destination, and, importantly, Pascal's "Pensees."

And since nothing says sexual tension like an old French philosopher/mathematician, Jean-Louis is snowbound and stays the night with Maud, though, to the alluring woman's disappointment, chastely. He's committed to the mysterious blonde woman in the church who surely must be pure. But is she? As you'll learn, the evening's debate was clearly not all a bunch of intellectual smoke.

Clever, insightful and yes, a tad wearisome My Night at Maud's is nevertheless a lovely film (beautifully shot by Nestor Almendros) that showcases Rohmer's grace with the panning shot. It's not a showy film, and yet the subtle symmetry and black and white chilliness is almost startlingly resonant. Yes, the film requires patience. And, yes, it's almost obnoxiously cerebral, but there's real feeling amidst the coffee house clatter.

Lovingly transferred on this Criterion edition, the picture comes with a most useful extra, "On Pascal," one of Rohmer's televised looks at Pascal. In this episode ("Reading Between the Lines"), he interviews authors, and philosophers Brice Parain and Dominique Dubarle, about Pascal's famous "wager." Also on board is "Telecinema," a 1974 episode of the French television show in which host Olivier Lorsac interviews film critics Jean Douchet, actor Trintignant, and producer Pierre Cottrell. Working as endnotes to the film, the extra intelligent insight enriches the already penetrating picture. The DVD is a must for the discerning (and real) Rohmer fan.

Straight Shooter--'Bullet Boy'

Powerful, gritty, and poignant, writer-director Saul Dibb's debut feature, Bullet Boy, is surprisingly potent.

Why surprising? Because after reading briefly about the film, with its comparisons to Boyz N the Hood, with its look at youth-oriented urban violence and its exploration of the danger of guns, one might worry clichés would abound. Thankfully, they don't.

It does help that the film is set in East London, or rather, a very real East London. This isn't the glamorized Guy Ritchie look at criminality (i.e. good-looking, poppy, grubby fun), this is down, dirty, and at times, in-your-face cinema. Dibb, who made documentaries before this, utilizes his past work with a raw approach that feels both respectful and frightening.

In an 8 Mile-like move, rapper Ashley Walters (otherwise known as Asher D., one of the lead rappers in the British rap group So Solid Crew) headlines the picture as the troubled Ricky. The fact that aspects of the actor's own life mirror the picture (Walters has done some time; he's also been busted for possessing a firearm) offers extra layers of truth, deepening his impressive performance. And you never get the feeling that either Walters or the director is using his "red" for cool points (a la Get Rich or Die Tryin').

The film begins with Ricky's release from prison, something that's made him determined, like many an ex-con, to put his life back together. But going straight won't be easy, and just as he's heading home to Cardiff, he finds trouble. A trivial street confrontation escalates after Ricky sides with his best friend, Wisdom (Leon Black), against a local "rude boy." He's immediately returned to the thick of violence, street loyalty, and all the elements that have caused him to stray.

Worse, his 12-year-old brother, Curtis (Luke Fraser), positively worships Ricky. And though Curtis is intelligent, soulful, and at the age where he could choose a different path (watch the fascinating documentary The Boys of Baraka for a similar, real-life glimpse), you can feel the struggle.

Directed with a keen eye toward authenticity, relevant without being preachy, and full of skilled performances (Walters and young Fraser are stand-outs), Bullet Boy is memorable and richly compelling. Though it's wonderful to see the film on DVD (most Americans were not exposed to the picture) it's a shame so few extras grace the disc. (There's just a photo gallery and trailer.) A commentary track would have been nice, and, more than likely, intriguing. Still, the powerful movie speaks for itself.

Fiery Feds--'G Men'

GMen3.jpg

A turning point in the gangster genre, ”G” Men is a significant picture for many reasons. For one, it made an effort to highlight the FBI over those Public Enemies so understandably captivating on depression-era movie screens. After the popularity of early 1930's classics like Little Caesar, Public Enemy and Scarface the Shame of a Nation in which Paul Muni spits out that machine gun with hyper-infectious "Damn it feels good to be a gangster" zeal, fears that film-goers might over-sympathize and glamorize gangsters created an outcry against cinematic underworld figures. Hence, “G” Men's valiant and violent heroes of the FBI.

Another point of interest is director William Keighley. Keighley cemented his semi-documentary style with “G” Men, an approach later seen in films like Bullets or Ballots and the remarkable noir, The Street With No Name. Keighley imbued “G “Men with a gritty, street level feel, extending and melding his rough and tumble style with the Warner Brothers look. And of course, there's James Cagney--that pugnacious bottle rocket whose genius talent and endless charisma takes hold of every movie he graces. And Cagney makes FBI work look (forgive the easy use of profanity) fucking cool.
GMenPoster.jpg

It's also interesting that while “G” Men attempts to move away from the appeal of criminals, it's a shadier guy who proves invaluable to the story. As Drew Casper, Professor of American Film at USC, says of the movie, it's a case of “having your cake and eating it too.” So true. “G” Men was just as brutal, just as edgy and just as rat-a-tat glamorous as Scarface.

That “shady” guy is James “Brick” Davis (Cagney), a lawyer whose only job opportunities are steeped in the mob world. But after his old friend, a G Man, is murdered, Brick joins the good guys, training with amiable agent Hugh Farrell (Lloyd Nolan) and hothead Jeff McCord (Robert Armstrong). Brick's receives some arched eyebrows based on his past, especially with his old ties to racketeer 'Mac' McKay (William Harrigan), but his inside information concerning the rackets aids fellow Feds and in the end, Brick, to go after the mob. Along the way he becomes interested in McCord's sister (Margaret Lindsay) and deals with a double crossing ex girlfriend (Ann Dvorak), now a gangster's wife.

Full of taut, powerful action sequences, “G” Men is a wonderfully involved depiction of law, disorder and artful exploitation. It's no wonder J. Edgar Hoover apparently approved of the thing.
GMen1.jpg

And, to use the parlance of the times, the DVD is absolutely the bee's knee's. As usual with these Warner Brothers' collections, the extras offer all kinds of goodies. The film begins with the FBI propaganda prologue, added when the film was re-issued in the late 1940's. Also on board is a wonderful gallery of 1935 short subjects including a vintage newsreel, a comedy short “the Old Grey Mayor” starring Bob Hope, the cartoon “Buddy the Gee Man” and trailers for “G” Men and Devil Dogs of the Air.

There's also “How I Play Golf by Bobby Jones No 11: Practice Shots” and the incredibly fun “Things You Never See on the Screen: Breakdowns of 1935”--bloopers from that era. For some reason watching classic actors yell ”nuts!” after flubbing a line remains consistently hilarious.

Another terrific extra is the new featurette “Morality and the Code: A How-to- Manual for Hollywood” during which pre-code films are discussed along with the emerging censors. Filled with interesting insight from commentators as varied as film scholars to Martin Scorsese to Michael Madsen to Theresa Russell, it's an educational look at how much the films both changed and danced around the production code. “G” Men is obviously an excellent example of the latter. On top of all this, the film's engrossing commentary track is provided by film historian Richard Jewell.
G-Men2.jpg

A gripping, exciting and just plain bad-f-ing-ass picture with an electric performance by James Cagney, ”G” Men remains one of the greatest films about the FBI and a highlight of 1930's cinema. And Cagney...he makes me all fuzzy and buzzy.

Actress, Interrupted--'Frances'

Frances1.jpg

I just re-read Frances Farmer's harrowing autobiography "Will There Really Be a Morning?" and the depressing story brought me back to the depressing film based on her life, "Frances." I love Frances Farmer. I love Jessica Lange. I wish I loved the movie.

If not for Jessica Lange, Frances (1982) would have been yet another studio mangling of the life and legend of Frances Farmer, the gifted but notorious actress of the 1930s. A chance to really tell her story was clearly at hand when the film was conceived (read Farmer's autobiography and you can see why), but through script problems, studio requests, and one strange association with the conspiracy-obsessed ex-convict and proven liar Stewart Jacobson (played in the film as "Harry York" by Sam Shepard), Frances veers into fantasy — a fantasy Frances Farmer surely would not have appreciated.

Many fine films based on real lives or events stray from facts, add characters, or even re-invent history (JFK and Nixon are supreme examples), but the problems with Frances are twofold. First, suffering from a weak script, it's not an entirely focused picture, and it never creates a strong case about just why Farmer had to endure such torment. Secondly, the picture soft-pedals a harrowing tale about one woman's fight against both the indignities of Hollywood and the abuse of the mental profession. What happened to Frances Farmer is an abomination, and not because we'd never see her again shine as an actress but because her life was, in some cases, perversely and hideously stolen from her.

FrancesFarmer.jpg

It's the ultimate irony that the story of "the bad girl of West Seattle," the troubled non-conformist Hollywood star who rarely censored her thoughts, was under the control of a major studio who deemed her real life too depressing. As director Graeme Clifford states in the commentary on the DVD, you don't want to "nickel and dime the audience with facts." Too bad — Farmer's facts were never boring.

That said, in the hands of Lange Frances is a thoroughly watchable picture — an almost traumatizing experience that showcases Lange at her finest. Lange not only looks like Farmer, but also embodies everything we've ever read about the talented star: The understandable drinking (who didn't tear it up in Hollywood?), the rage (how many stars were under studio control? Farmer was just too strong-willed to take it), and the desperation to find freedom. But the powers that be — Mother, Hollywood, and the Mental Institution — helped keep this intelligent woman from reaching her goals.

Frances begins in 1931 when a 16-year old Farmer writes a high school essay entitled "God Dies." This is just the first of many cases where she enrages Seattle's moral majority, who later branded her a communist. A talented stage actress in college, Farmer lands in Hollywood, where she declares "I'm not glamour girl." Nevertheless, she marries a young actor and makes movies (mostly to her chagrin), including Howard Hawks' Come and Get It (a film she was proud of, despite what this movie wants us to believe).

frances5.jpg

Exasperated with Hollywood, Farmer ventures to New York and finds a home in the Group Theater, and (to her downfall) has a torrid affair with the married playwright Clifford Odets. After he dumps her, she returns to Hollywood and gets into the legendary trouble that would land her in horrifying mental institutions — where she underwent experimental medication, shock treatments, rape, disgusting facilities, and finally (and this is something that's speculative) a lobotomy until her release in 1950. Frances4.jpg

Lange carries us through this hell with brilliance, but Frances decides to shift the focus of the relationship with Farmer's deranged, bitch mother (played by Kim Stanley) to the more romantic overtures of Harry York. According to the film, York tried to reach out to Farmer after her inconceivably unfair and colorful court appearance (well-documented in Kenneth Anger's Hollywood Babylon in which we learn Farmer wrote her profession down as "cocksucker"). He also was responsible for Farmer's first escape from the sanitarium and the reason she was presentable for a hearing that excused from her first asylum (the film contends Harry sneaks into her ward and gets a doctor to inject her with a drug that would make her more lucid). He also asked her marry him when she was under the legal guardianship of her mother, and he loved her until the end of her days.

Frances3.jpg

Yes sir, Frances wants us to believe that — despite everything written to the contrary — Farmer may have had a decent life had she just ran away with this Prince Charming. It's an ill-conceived cinematic conceit, and an insult to Farmer's memory at that. Jessica Lange should have directed this film — she's the picture's real auteur.

frances-farmer.jpg

The gorgeous Frances Farmer. Why?

Vulgar Talents--'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf'

taylorlizpic.jpg

Because I watched Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf yet again tonight.

Back when I was a teenager studying movies, back before I knew my own first-hand dysfunctional relationships past my parent's, one of my film professors said to me, "Watch Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf every three years of your life; you'll understand it and relate to it better upon each viewing."

Perhaps horrifyingly, but ever so poignantly, he couldn't have been any more correct. Mike Nichols' debut film, and masterpiece, the adaptation of Edward Albee's searing stage play, is a blisteringly real, though perfectly stagy, look at the destructive and at times psychotic battles between an aging alcoholic couple intent on outdoing each other with wickedly mean verbal gymnastics. A shocking picture for 1966, the film was an expletive-ridden salvo that frightened some and impressed many. So notable was Woolf that this film to first use the words "goddamn" and "bugger" went on to Oscar gold, earning Elizabeth Taylor a greatly deserved second Academy Award. It also garnered Sandy Dennis a Best Supporting Actress Oscar, and won Best Black and White Cinematography for Haskell Wexler. On top of those accolades, the picture was nominated for Best Picture, Best Actor (Richard Burton), Best Supporting Actor (George Segal), Best Director (Mike Nichols), Best Screenplay (Ernest Lehman), Best Sound, Best Original Music Score, and Best Film Editing. Though Oscars really mean nothing, they can point out a certain zeitgeist which leads to my question: Why do I think that Oscar would never take such chances today?

whosafraidposter.jpg

Though Bonnie and Clyde was a rally cry for the emerging '70s cinema, Virginia Woolf was a formidable front runner and, in many ways, much more disturbingly violent. In it, words and deeds are doled out with a ferocious vitriol that's still remains unmatched today. Nothing so nasty has ever been so eloquent.

Beginning with a gorgeous title sequence during which we watch History Professor George (Richard Burton) and his saucy wife Martha (Elizabeth Taylor) walking back from a function drunk and cackling, the movie immediately places us in their dark universe—one of shattered hopes, nihilism, and dipsomaniacal game playing. To George's surprise, Martha is expecting guests (at such a late hour) and, after their return home where she famously utters the Bette Davis line "what a dump" while asking "what's the name of the picture?" (it was the seminal King Vidor camp-fest Beyond the Forest) while eating chicken and calling George a "cluck," they booze it up. And booze it up. And then they open the door to a couple of young colleagues who have no idea what they're in for.

whosafraidchoking.jpg

Nick (George Segal) and Honey (Sandy Dennis) are attempting to be cordial, but since Martha's father holds weight in the university, Nick's going to sit this one out, no matter how weird it gets. And the two-hour (in movie time, the picture takes the couples into the wee hours) party goes beyond weird—it enters a vortex of nasty, though sometimes wistful, revelations for both parties. The two couples become increasingly sauced, and move their action to a nighttime bar where a vulgar dance breaks out between Nick and Martha. Nervous Honey admits she wants a baby, Nick admits his wife (whom George calls "slim hipped" and, at once point, "monkey nipples") had a hysterical pregnancy. George tells a strange story of a child killing his parents. And Martha, well, she deals with the "blue-haired, blonde-eyed" kid ("bringing up Baby"), into which George digs his claws once and for all.

whosafraid-1.jpg

With the film's brilliant performances, and Nichols' active, observing camera, the picture attains a visceral power that leaves the viewer both constrained and transfixed. There is little respite from these characters actions, and even moments of humor are soon met with yet another discomforting bout of disgrace, cruelty, or sadness. But it never becomes sickening; on the contrary, there's a sense of nobility to this film that's unusual for its often-crass subject matter. And once we make it through this hellacious night, we learn that there's even a lot of love within these dueling characters. George and Martha may be poster children for extreme dysfunction, but dammit if they're not meant to be. And there's something oddly romantic about that.

So my film professor was right. Watching the film every three years of your life does deepen the experience. And in my perhaps, perverse case (I've been watching the thing every one year of my life), makes me root for the characters more and more. I love George and Martha. I'd certainly rather be George and Martha over, say Harry and Sally. Sick? Yes. But "Get the Guests" is a lot more interesting than Pictionary.